Written by the Continuous Improvement Fund
In anticipation of the curbside collection contracts renewal, pending regulatory/policy change and the development of a 30-year Solid Waste Master Plan, the City of Ottawa retained Dillon Consulting Limited (Dillon) to complete a study and develop a curbside collection model. The model assisted the City in identifying the most cost-effective curbside waste collection system to help support increased waste diversion and reduce residential garbage, while also considering greenhouse gas impact, and cost of implementation.
The Microsoft Excel model was designed as a tool to assist staff in developing curbside collection options and/or new policies. It is based in Microsoft Excel.
The different waste diversion policies that were considered in the model were:
- Bag/container limits for garbage
- Pay As You Throw
- Clear bag program for garbage
- Containerized garbage program
- Mandatory participation in diversion programs
- Material bans e.g., grass clippings, organics and recyclables in garbage
The collection options considered in the model were:
- Status quo
- Weekly co-collection of blue/black box
- Status quo level of service with a 4-day collection week
- 4 day collection week
- Status quo with separate weekly leaf/yard waste collection
- Separate bi-weekly leaf/yard waste collection
- Weekly collection of recyclables and leaf/yard waste
The model requires input of household information, collection seasons/periods, materials collected, truck compartment and utilization parameters, collection factors, collection costs and waste tonnage breakdown by material type to establish a baseline scenario, which is then used to compare against several different collection and policy options. It can compare new collection and policy options against status quo parameters including costs, vehicles required for servicing, diversion rates, and greenhouse gas (GHG) impacts.
Modeling required resources and system performance
Designed for adaptability, the model will allow other Ontario municipalities to analyze their integrated waste collection system by revising the inputs to the model and waste collection program policy customizations. The model produces several estimated outputs, including:
- Number of trucks required (per season, per collection stream);
- Number of hours required to collect materials (per season, per collection stream);
- Annual cost per household and per person ($);
- Capture rate (kg/person);
- Diversion rate (%); and
- GHG impacts (tonnes CO2 equivalents per year).
Note that this study only looks at residential households that receive curbside collection and does not include bulk material collection.
Lessons learned in Ottawa
Key outcomes of the modelling exercise for Ottawa were: